翻訳と辞書 |
Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc. : ウィキペディア英語版 | Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.
''Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.'', 643 A.2d 642 (1994), was a case decided by the Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey that first applied public policy considerations instead of the touch and concern doctrine when deciding the validity of a restrictive covenant.〔Casner, A.J. et al. ''Cases and Text on Property, Fifth Edition.'' Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2004, p. 1024〕 ==Factual background== Davidson Bros., Inc. operated several grocery stores in downtown New Brunswick, New Jersey. After vacating one inner city supermarket, Davidson added a restrictive covenant not to compete to the lease for the vacated property. The covenant disallowed the lessee from operating another grocery store in the space.〔Casner, p. 1020〕
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)』 ■ウィキペディアで「Davidson Bros., Inc. v. D. Katz & Sons, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|